Posts Tagged ‘effective leadership’

Do you focus on hours or output?

Monday, February 15th, 2010

As a leader, is it more important to you that people put in the hours they’re supposed to put in or produce their output on schedule?  Your answer defines your leadership style.

I was once told of an incident where a team of people in an organization had worked long and hard over a week to complete a project.  They had put in evenings and weekend time to finish – and do a great job – by the deadline by Thursday at noon.  They were tired, but they pumped – really excited for all they’d accomplished. Because of all the extra time they had put in, they decided to leave Friday at 3pm to have a bit more time over the weekend.

Come Monday morning, their boss was waiting for them and gave them hell for cutting out early. They were supposed to be at work until 5pm and they weren’t there.  It didn’t matter that nothing happened and they weren’t needed. They were supposed to be there and he watched the clock to make sure they were.

Clock
Image by Caucas’ via Flickr

Well, they instantly went from being hyper-motivated and excited to being totally dejected and demotivated.  In those few minutes, their boss killed everything that he had gained from their increased commitment the week before and guaranteed that when the next deadline came, they would never meet it, because they figured ‘why bother?’  And so from that point on, the productivity went down the tubes, deadlines weren’t met and morale was in the toilet because the boss got into a snit about 2 hours they weren’t at their desks when they had already put in 20 extra hours over the preceding week – that they weren’t paid for.

It is simple little choices like this, that every boss makes, that defines their leadership.

In tomorrow’s Leadership180.Net, featuring an interview with Terry Brock, we’ll see inside Skype and find out what choice they make in this type of situation – and what results they get as a result.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

How does this impact you?

Thursday, February 26th, 2009

I've worked for nearly 20 years helping a wide range of industries develop innovative strategies, both from the inside of the organization and from outside as a consultant.  In my work, one thing I've heard over an over again when I provide examples of innovation to spur thinking is 'that's fine for them, but we're different'. 

Yesterday I wrote about innovative leadership from restaurants in the face of the current economic challenges, and I suspect they will garner a similar reaction from some.  'That's fine, but we're different', and that, to be blunt, is a cop-out.

Having worked with and in so many industries, what I see is that the industry itself has very little relevance.  What is important are the people and their perspective, and they all deal with people and have a perspective. 

Do you engage your people?  Do you look for new opportunities?  Do you create leader-ful communities?  Do you believe that you can learn from other industries and organizations, even if they have nothing to do with what you do?  These actions and perspectives are common to all successful strategic innovation.  If  you believe you can engage your people and innovate, you're right.  If you believe you can't, you're right.  It has nothing to do with what business you're in.

And time and again, when we work with our various clients, they also come to realize this, and that is why they succeed.  Yes, they are 'special' as all individuals are special in their own unique way.  But they are not 'special' in that the principles of effective leadership and innovation will not work for them.  That is simply an excuse to take no action and to stay in helplessness.  And that is an excuse you have to abandon if you really want to take the lead, especially today.

That's my 2 cents.  What do you think?